Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2018 20:11:50 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: future of compiler wrappers It came up again today on #musl that gratuitous use of musl-gcc was breaking something (this time, ppc and mips toolchains that were already musl-targeting but where the musl-gcc specs broke things), and I expressed a sentiment that the compiler wrapper scripts tend to reflect badly on musl, and that I'd really rather not keep maintaining them but pass maintainership of them off to someone else as a separate project for users who still want to use them. Would anyone be particularly upset to see them go from the main musl repo/releases, and is anyone interested in maintaining them out-of-tree separately from musl? Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.