Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 06:53:34 +0200
From: Markus Wichmann <>
Subject: Re: Maybe not a bug but a possible omission?

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:30:52AM +0000, Jon Scobie wrote:
> Intended types? It's a macro. Where is the type definition? It is inferred.

Inferred by a standardised algorithm. So where's the problem?

> Why not just make it implicit when the language allows for it?

But... the type _is_ implicit here. Also, Rich explained why. Do not
attempt to fix swig by changing musl.

The type inferrence rules haven't changed since 1989, except to add long
long int to the list.

Also, please add your answers at the bottom on this list.

> ----
> The information contained in this communication is private and confidential 
> and may contain privileged material. It is intended solely for use by the 
> recipient(s).

Well then you probably should not have sent it to a mailing list with an
online archive.

> Copying, distributing, disclosing or using any of the 
> information in it or any attachments is strictly prohibited and may be 
> unlawful.

In that generality, that is only true in the US. However, this list is


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.