Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 23:37:45 +0100 From: ardi <ardillasdelmonte@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com, jonathanchesterfield@...il.com Subject: Re: Views on bare metal port Hi, I'm also in need of a libc whose syscall interface was easily hook-able. Not knowing of any libc that has all the syscalls clearly encapsulated (and encapsulated at the C level rather than at assembly level), but considering the clean design of musl, I've chosen musl as probably the best option. You can check the thread I started in the list last Christmas: http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2017/12/21/3 ardi On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 2:38 PM, Jon Chesterfield <jonathanchesterfield@...il.com> wrote: > Hello musl, > > I'm writing an llvm back end for a custom asic. There's no kernel, limited > syscall support. As far as I can tell from the source tree, musl expects a > host OS. I'm aware of a couple of projects running musl by emulating the > Linux syscall interface. > > I would like to derive libc from a subset of musl. Math.h included, > filesystem excluded. Malloc and threads tdb. > > Are there any bare metal projects that use musl without syscall emulation? > If not, would one be of interest to this mailing list? > > Cheers, > > Jon > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.