[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.20.13.1802051912120.25773@monopod.intra.ispras.ru>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 19:18:44 +0300 (MSK)
From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@...ras.ru>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] track pthread stack guard sizes
On Fri, 2 Feb 2018, William Pitcock wrote:
> --- a/src/internal/pthread_impl.h
> +++ b/src/internal/pthread_impl.h
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ struct pthread {
> char *dlerror_buf;
> int dlerror_flag;
> void *stdio_locks;
> + size_t guard_size;
> uintptr_t canary_at_end;
> void **dtv_copy;
> };
Doesn't this break SSP on powerpc and powerpc64 by changing offset of
'canary_at_end'? If not, can you please mention why in the commit message?
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
