Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 06:35:49 +0200
From: Waldemar Brodkorb <>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <>, wdlkmpx <>,
	busybox <>, Waldemar Brodkorb <>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <>
Subject: Re: Re: bbox: musl versus uclibc

Thomas Petazzoni wrote,

> Hello,
> On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 15:25:20 +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> > These "ng" names are not the best idea.
> > 
> > Maybe uclibc-ng can just supersede uclibc?
> Waldemar proposed many, many times to Bernhard to take over the
> project, and Bernhard essentially never replied. So it was either
> adding -ng or doing nothing.
> I think adding -ng was better than doing nothing :)
> And yes, I believe uClibc-ng should just supersede uClibc, or at least
> that should point to to make more
> people aware of the fact that uClibc is alive again.
> > We can give domain (or the server itself) to it.
> Cc'ing Waldemar, who maintains uClibc-ng.

A link from to would be nice.
Then people can still search the old mailinglists or find
the old git history.

If there would be consense about, the domain could be
transferred to me and I could try to provide a cleaner access to
old and new project data. 

best regards

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.