Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 13:57:01 +0100 From: Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: bbox: musl versus uclibc On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com> wrote: > On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 12:59:41 -0500, wdlkmpx wrote: > >> The project has been badly managed.. thats the only reason i can think > > uClibc-ng is alive at https://uclibc-ng.org/. Regular releases > (actually more regular than musl in recent months!), updated web site, > responsive maintainer, lots of cleanup in the code base, and QA effort. > I just visited the link you provided. I was curious to know whether to compile a program one still has to "make menuconfig", which IMO is fine for the linux kernel. So I clicked the "Documentation" link. It leads to an "Overview over different language related features". What did I do wrong? Jorge Almeida
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.