Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 12:20:30 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: symlinks of glibc shared libs to musl libc.so On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 10:43:21AM +0000, sylvain.bertrand@...il.com wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:06:44AM +0000, sylvain.bertrand@...il.com wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 10:02:21PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 01:36:40AM +0000, sylvain.bertrand@...il.com wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I have some binaries which are dependent on glibc shared libs (except libgcc_s) and the glibc dynamic loader. > > > > For instance: libdl, libpthreads... > > > > > > > > Do symlinks on libc.so based on glibc sonames give me a chance to make them work? (in > > > > theory yes, since the symbols are there). > > > > > > Are you asking about trying to run glibc-linked binaries with musl > > > libc.so? > > > > Exactly! > > > > From you experience and feedbacks, do you think I have a chance with the proper > > glibc symlinks? > > No answer, does it mean there are too many glibc specific symbols? You're going to need to clarify exactly what you mean by "proper glibc symlinks". As I understood it, and as I told you in the part of my reply you didn't quote, what you were talking about doing with symlinks makes no sense, but maybe I misunderstood. Please describe in detail what you want to achieve and what setup you're proposing/asking if it will work. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.