[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 22:14:31 +0200
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
To: mzpqnxow <musl@...qnxow.com>
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Subject: Re: Issues building gdbserver with musl
Hello,
On Sat, 03 Jun 2017 17:19:39 +0000, mzpqnxow wrote:
> Which version of gdb are you using?
Presently, I was testing with gdb 7.11.1
> I've found I had to patch several
> versions of gdb when building gdbserver for non-x86 platforms, possibly due
> to less QA testing of these "obscure" platforms on the gdb dev side.
For all the reports I made, gdbserver was building fine on the same
architectures with other C libraries (glibc or uclibc). So there are no
architecture problems per-se, only C library problems.
> Have you had success building the same gdbserver versions with glibc or
> uClibc for the same architectures?
See above: yes.
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
