Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:41:51 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, dwmw2@...radead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jarod@...hat.com, jogo@...nwrt.org, david.heidelberger@...t.cz, maillist-linux@...fooze.de, mikko.rapeli@....fi, musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] uapi glibc compat: fix musl libc compatibility On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 03:14:21PM +0200, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > > > On 04/20/2017 10:36 PM, David Miller wrote: > > From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> > > Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 21:14:37 +0100 > > > >> I agree, except I don't think you're going far enough. Those "standard > >> names" you mention... some of this stuff actually depends on __GLIBC__, > >> and *that* isn't right either. > > > > Yep, that's something that needs correcting. > > > Should all libc implementations define __GLIBC__ Absolutely not. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.