Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:14:21 +0200
From: Hauke Mehrtens <>
To: David Miller <>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] uapi glibc compat: fix musl libc compatibility

On 04/20/2017 10:36 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Woodhouse <>
> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 21:14:37 +0100
>> I agree, except I don't think you're going far enough. Those "standard
>> names" you mention... some of this stuff actually depends on __GLIBC__,
>> and *that* isn't right either.
> Yep, that's something that needs correcting.
Should all libc implementations define __GLIBC__ or could we at least
switch the kernel UAPI to !__KERNEL__ here?


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.