Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:14:21 +0200 From: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, dwmw2@...radead.org Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jarod@...hat.com, jogo@...nwrt.org, david.heidelberger@...t.cz, maillist-linux@...fooze.de, mikko.rapeli@....fi, musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] uapi glibc compat: fix musl libc compatibility On 04/20/2017 10:36 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> > Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 21:14:37 +0100 > >> I agree, except I don't think you're going far enough. Those "standard >> names" you mention... some of this stuff actually depends on __GLIBC__, >> and *that* isn't right either. > > Yep, that's something that needs correcting. > Should all libc implementations define __GLIBC__ or could we at least switch the kernel UAPI to !__KERNEL__ here? Hauke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.