Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 19:53:09 +0200
From: fab10 <0xfab10@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: byteswap.h

I had a look at byteswap.h and it seems to me that the code is not very 
efficient. Every function in this header could be translated in a single 
assembly instruction with the gcc intrinsics:

__builtin_bswap16
__builtin_bswap32
__builtin_bswap64

Is there a reason to not use these gcc intrinsics?

Bye

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.