Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 08:35:54 +0800 From: Yousong Zhou <yszhou4tech@...il.com> To: Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com> Cc: gdb-patches@...rceware.org, musl@...ts.openwall.com, Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>, Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix invalid sigprocmask call On 24 March 2017 at 21:37, Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com> wrote: > On 03/24/2017 01:05 PM, Yousong Zhou wrote: >> On 24 March 2017 at 20:55, Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com> wrote: >>> The standard wasn't built on a vacuum. It starts by ratifying common >>> implementation behavior. If no historical implementation behaves like what >>> you're suggesting, what's the point of enforcing that, when it's clearly >>> NOT the intent? You're just causing porting pain for no good reason. >>> Please file a bug against the standard to have the error section clarified instead. >> >> Lol, now I will consider the idea of bumping the door of POSIX committee ;) > > No need. Go here: > > http://austingroupbugs.net/ Thanks for the pointer. Here is the issue link http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1132 Regards, yousong
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.