musl - Re: [PATCH] Fix invalid sigprocmask call

Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAECwjAj2d_djuUan=HESep9KgpvU=Uqb2oLfQEjEKpCCQZNdeg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 08:35:54 +0800
From: Yousong Zhou <yszhou4tech@...il.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@...rceware.org, musl@...ts.openwall.com, 
	Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>, Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix invalid sigprocmask call

On 24 March 2017 at 21:37, Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 03/24/2017 01:05 PM, Yousong Zhou wrote:
>> On 24 March 2017 at 20:55, Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com> wrote:
>>> The standard wasn't built on a vacuum.  It starts by ratifying common
>>> implementation behavior.  If no historical implementation behaves like what
>>> you're suggesting, what's the point of enforcing that, when it's clearly
>>> NOT the intent?  You're just causing porting pain for no good reason.
>>> Please file a bug against the standard to have the error section clarified instead.
>>
>> Lol, now I will consider the idea of bumping the door of POSIX committee ;)
>
> No need.  Go here:
>
>  http://austingroupbugs.net/

Thanks for the pointer.  Here is the issue link

    http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1132


Regards,
                yousong

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.