Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 13:37:21 +0000 From: Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com> To: Yousong Zhou <yszhou4tech@...il.com> Cc: gdb-patches@...rceware.org, musl@...ts.openwall.com, Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix invalid sigprocmask call On 03/24/2017 01:05 PM, Yousong Zhou wrote: > On 24 March 2017 at 20:55, Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com> wrote: >> The standard wasn't built on a vacuum. It starts by ratifying common >> implementation behavior. If no historical implementation behaves like what >> you're suggesting, what's the point of enforcing that, when it's clearly >> NOT the intent? You're just causing porting pain for no good reason. >> Please file a bug against the standard to have the error section clarified instead. > > Lol, now I will consider the idea of bumping the door of POSIX committee ;) No need. Go here: http://austingroupbugs.net/ > I am cc-ing musl-libc list now. Original thread here: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-03/msg00426.html Thanks, Pedro Alves
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.