[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 13:37:21 +0000
From: Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com>
To: Yousong Zhou <yszhou4tech@...il.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@...rceware.org, musl@...ts.openwall.com,
Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix invalid sigprocmask call
On 03/24/2017 01:05 PM, Yousong Zhou wrote:
> On 24 March 2017 at 20:55, Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com> wrote:
>> The standard wasn't built on a vacuum. It starts by ratifying common
>> implementation behavior. If no historical implementation behaves like what
>> you're suggesting, what's the point of enforcing that, when it's clearly
>> NOT the intent? You're just causing porting pain for no good reason.
>> Please file a bug against the standard to have the error section clarified instead.
>
> Lol, now I will consider the idea of bumping the door of POSIX committee ;)
No need. Go here:
http://austingroupbugs.net/
> I am cc-ing musl-libc list now.
Original thread here:
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-03/msg00426.html
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
