Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 18:19:24 +0100
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: syscall table discrepancies

* Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> [2017-02-17 23:32:12 -0500]:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 03:41:29AM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> > > > or1k
> > > > -o__NR__llseek 62
> > > > +o__NR_llseek 62
> 
> Indeed, I misread the direction of the diff. But perhaps we should use
> the upstream/reasonable name and have:
> 
> #ifdef SYS__llseek
> #define SYS_llseek SYS__llseek
> #endif
> 
> in src/internal/syscall.h, and use SYS_llseek in the source files.
> Thoughts?

makes sense, SYS_llseek will be the name on future 32bit archs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.