Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 19:55:38 -0300 From: "Matias A. Fonzo" <selk@...gora.org> To: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> Cc: dragora-users@...gnu.org, musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Darkcrusade 2017Jan05 (cross compiler set) On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 15:57:38 +0100 Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> wrote: > * Matias A. Fonzo <selk@...gora.org> [2017-01-06 20:31:34 -0300]: > > On Fri, 6 Jan 2017 21:45:18 +0100 > > Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> wrote: > > > > > * Matias A. Fonzo <selk@...gora.org> [2017-01-06 17:20:05 > > > -0300]: > > > > > > > > The following architectures are supported: > > > > armv7hl, armv8hl, i586, microblaze, mips, powerpc, x32, x86_64. > > > > > > > > > > what is the difference between armv7hl and armv8hl? > > > > The only difference is that armv8hl is tuned for cortex-a8... > > > > cortex-a8 is an armv7-a core, i think only 64bit arm cores > support armv8-a isa (yes the naming is confusing). > > > > (there should not be many differences between armv8-a and armv7-a > > > isa in aarch32 execution state and armv8-a is backward compatible > > > with armv7-a) > > > > Thanks! -- I've removed the target file for armv7hl. > > > > i think you should keep the armv7hl and remove the armv8hl one. Are you sure?: armv8hl has the following options for GCC: "--with-arch=armv7-a --with-float=hard --with-fpu=neon --with-tune=cortex-a8" meanwhile armv7hl was: "--with-arch=armv7-a --with-float=hard --with-fpu=neon" 'armv8hl' is like "it can run on the armv7-a but armv8-a has the honor". This is confusing, so.. only 64bit is capable of armv8-a?. > > P.S: I'm interested in the new architectures supported by Musl, too. > > > > Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.