Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 16:09:15 +0100 From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> To: vlse <vlse@...ra.biz> Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: Query about current practice of installing linux kernel header files * vlse <vlse@...ra.biz> [2017-01-06 20:11:18 +0530]: > Sorry, I didn't received mail from Szabolcs Nagy to my inbox. i forgot to cc you > I am unable to understand the Makefile fully. > > May you please correct me on this: > > 1) First musl include headers files are installed. > 2) Then linux kernel header files are copied over. > > Is this correct? > sorry i remembered incorrectly, the header install order does not matter if you use staging + copy (the problem is that the kernel install_headers removes the include/scsi/ directory first which contains libc headers so installing libc and linux headers to the same place can break, but if you copy the linux headers from a staging dir then it works) > What about building busybox with musl-libc? > It needed few adapted headers of linux kernel as well as musl libc ones? alpine linux applies the same kernel header patches that sabotage uses http://git.alpinelinux.org/cgit/aports/plain/main/linux-headers/ i think since http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/commit/?id=04983f2272382af92eb8f8838964ff944fbb8258 there is an easier (more upstreamable) fix for the linux headers but i'm not sure how much of busybox is affected
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.