Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 16:06:09 -0500
From: Rich Felker <>
To: Reiner Herrmann <>
Subject: Re: musl 1.1.16 build failure on armhf

On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 09:51:24PM +0100, Reiner Herrmann wrote:
> Hi,
> when trying to build musl on armhf, the build fails with the following
> error (gcc 6.3.0), which is also seen on the Debian build servers [0]:

The error is from gas; do you know the binutils version? Also, what
-march is gcc configured for?

> > gcc -std=c99 -nostdinc -ffreestanding -fexcess-precision=standard -frounding-math -Wa,--noexecstack -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=700 -I./arch/arm -I./arch/generic -Iobj/src/internal -I./src/internal -Iobj/include -I./include  -Os -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-unwind-tables -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -Werror=implicit-int -Werror=pointer-sign -Werror=pointer-arith -include vis.h -Wa,-mimplicit-it=always -Wa,-mthumb  -fPIC -c -o obj/src/thread/arm/atomics.lo src/thread/arm/atomics.s
> > src/thread/arm/atomics.s: Assembler messages:
> > src/thread/arm/atomics.s:59: Error: invalid constant (1) after fixup
> > src/thread/arm/atomics.s:74: Error: invalid constant (1) after fixup
> > Makefile:158: recipe for target 'obj/src/thread/arm/atomics.lo' failed
> On other architectures it builds fine.
> Does someone know what the issue is?

I don't see why there would be fixups in those lines; they only
contain the immediate constant 1, and I don't see why it would be


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.