Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 16:06:09 -0500 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: Reiner Herrmann <reiner@...ner-h.de> Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: musl 1.1.16 build failure on armhf On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 09:51:24PM +0100, Reiner Herrmann wrote: > Hi, > > when trying to build musl on armhf, the build fails with the following > error (gcc 6.3.0), which is also seen on the Debian build servers : The error is from gas; do you know the binutils version? Also, what -march is gcc configured for? > > gcc -std=c99 -nostdinc -ffreestanding -fexcess-precision=standard -frounding-math -Wa,--noexecstack -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=700 -I./arch/arm -I./arch/generic -Iobj/src/internal -I./src/internal -Iobj/include -I./include -Os -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-unwind-tables -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -Werror=implicit-int -Werror=pointer-sign -Werror=pointer-arith -include vis.h -Wa,-mimplicit-it=always -Wa,-mthumb -fPIC -c -o obj/src/thread/arm/atomics.lo src/thread/arm/atomics.s > > src/thread/arm/atomics.s: Assembler messages: > > src/thread/arm/atomics.s:59: Error: invalid constant (1) after fixup > > src/thread/arm/atomics.s:74: Error: invalid constant (1) after fixup > > Makefile:158: recipe for target 'obj/src/thread/arm/atomics.lo' failed > > On other architectures it builds fine. > Does someone know what the issue is? I don't see why there would be fixups in those lines; they only contain the immediate constant 1, and I don't see why it would be invalid. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.