[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2017 16:37:04 -0600
From: "A. Wilcox" <awilfox@...lielinux.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: musl new-year's infrastructure resolutions
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 31/12/16 17:37, Rich Felker wrote:
> Here are some things I've really been wanting to get done for a
> while, that I/we should try to make happen in the coming months:
>
> Switching over wiki. The current wiki is essentially unmaintained.
> Kylie McClain (Somasis) has setup a clone of the content on a new
> git-based wiki that looks good. I still want to understand the
> intended workflow for getting changes published, but it's got to
> be better than the status quo where account creation doesn't even
> work.
>
> Adopting an issue tracker. This requires actually selecting one
> and setting up the infrastructure for it. The wiki could possibly
> be moved to the same infrastructure. (I want to keep webapp-ish
> stuff like wiki, issue tracker etc. off the server that hosts git
> and release downloads because anything interactive is a significant
> attack surface that puts integrity of code as risk.)
Are you looking for hardware, or for admin volunteers? No matter how
much I hate wearing the admin hat, I seem to be pretty good at running
stable Bugzilla servers, if that's something you are interested in.
It's one of the most flexible of the FLOSS issue trackers.
I'm not sure that you would be interested in running it on our infra,
seeing how musl is a distro-agnostic libc. However, I would certainly
be willing to help you get everything set up if you want help.
> Enabling git-over-https. This may require switching to a
> more-capable httpd or other infrastructure changes on the server.
>
> Website redesign and move to musl.libc.org. I don't have any
> concrete ideas for this yet, but I don't think the current website
> is at all in line with musl's maturity, current
> adoption/deployment, etc.
Are you additionally taking suggestions here? I might be able to mock
something up.
> Documentation. Existing manual should probably become a public git
> repo that contributors can submit patches/PRs for. Putting
> together lists of (1) what's outdated in the current one, and (2)
> what new content would be most valuable, might be a good place to
> start and one that could benefit from community involvement.
I would love to contribute good/better documentation to musl. If you
could make those lists I would definitely see what I could contribute.
- --arw
- --
A. Wilcox (awilfox)
Project Lead, Adélie Linux
http://adelielinux.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=abQE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
