Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 16:44:04 -0600 From: Laine Gholson <laine.gholson@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: SUSv2 c89 compilation environment symbols missing yes I know SUSv2 is obsolete, but then why does musl even bother to define _SC_XBS5_ILP32_OFF32 then? On 12/30/16 16:42, Rich Felker wrote: > On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 04:30:13PM -0600, Laine Gholson wrote: >> musl defines, e.g _SC_XBS5_ILP32_OFF32, but not _CS_XBS5_ILP32_OFF32_CFLAGS >> see http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/7908799/xcu/getconf.html > > That's an ancient standard; the current one is here: > > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/getconf.html > > It does not mention the macros you asked about. But it's also > describing the getconf utility, not the unistd.h header. The latter is > here: > > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/unistd.h.html > > and I don't see anything about the above macros. For what it's worth, > even the old version corresponding to the page you linked doesn't seem > to specify them: > > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/7908799/xsh/unistd.h.html > > Rich >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.