Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 12:30:42 +0100
From: Szabolcs Nagy <>
Subject: Re: Handling of L and ll prefixes different from glibc

* A. Wilcox <> [2016-12-14 22:01:59 -0600]:
> On 14/12/16 20:30, Rich Felker wrote:
> > BTW I wonder if gcc's -Wformat catches these errors.
> It is meant to.  I know that clang whines loudly on mismatched format
> specifiers, and I seem to recall it even whines on format specifiers
> that don't exist, but it has been a while since I checked GCC's.

despite clang propaganda, gcc actually has more detailed model
of printf now and thus gives better warnings

note that clang does not warn at all, while gcc caught two bugs.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.