Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:36:50 -0800 From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Cc: Sebastian Kemper <sebastian_ml@....net> Subject: Re: Robust shared mutexes? > On Nov 26, 2016, at 2:56 PM, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 11:51:05PM +0100, Sebastian Kemper wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 05:24:43PM -0500, Rich Felker wrote: >>> On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 10:49:44PM +0100, Sebastian Kemper wrote: >>>> Hello all, >>>> >>>> I'm cross-compiling for OpenWRT/LEDE and have this variable >>>> apr_cv_mutex_robust_shared. Should I set it to yes or no with musl? I've >>>> searched around but found conflicting infos. One post said there's no >>>> shared mutex support in musl >>> >>> Do you have a link for that? If there's incorrect information I'd like >>> to reply and see if it can be corrected. >> >> Hello Rich, >> >> Thank you very much for the reply! >> >> I looked for the link and it turns out it was an error on my part. The >> post wasn't referring to robust shared mutexes. It was regarding process >> shared mutexes >> >> http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2016-March/119214.html >> >> It says musl doesn't have process shared mutexes so one should set >> apr_cv_process_shared_works=no. I take it that is correct? > > No, it's incorrect and I have no idea where that idea came from. I'll > ask Khem. > IIRC it was not musl but papering over apr specific issue. I never got time to really dig in to root cause it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.