Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 00:01:10 +0100 From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Cc: Sebastian Kemper <sebastian_ml@....net> Subject: Re: Robust shared mutexes? * Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> [2016-11-26 17:56:18 -0500]: > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 11:51:05PM +0100, Sebastian Kemper wrote: > > > > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2016-March/119214.html > > > > It says musl doesn't have process shared mutexes so one should set > > apr_cv_process_shared_works=no. I take it that is correct? > > No, it's incorrect and I have no idea where that idea came from. I'll > ask Khem. > apr might care about sharing mutexes across i386 vs x86_64 ? that does not work (glibc ditto)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.