|
Message-ID: <20161111045401.GM1555@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 23:54:01 -0500 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: Felix Janda <felix.janda@...teo.de>, linux-devel@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org, musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] uapi libc compat: allow non-glibc to opt out of uapi definitions On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 08:40:44PM -0500, Felix Janda wrote: > Currently, libc-compat.h detects inclusion of specific glibc headers, > and defines corresponding _UAPI_DEF_* macros, which in turn are used in > uapi headers to prevent definition of conflicting structures/constants. > There is no such detection for other c libraries, for them the > _UAPI_DEF_* macros are always defined as 1, and so none of the possibly > conflicting definitions are suppressed. > > This patch enables non-glibc c libraries to request the suppression of > any specific interface by defining the corresponding _UAPI_DEF_* macro > as 0. > > This patch together with the recent musl libc commit > > http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/commit/?id=04983f2272382af92eb8f8838964ff944fbb8258 > > fixes the following compiler errors when <linux/in6.h> is included > after musl <netinet/in.h>: > > ../linux/in6.h:32:8: error: redefinition of 'struct in6_addr' > ../linux/in6.h:49:8: error: redefinition of 'struct sockaddr_in6' > ../linux/in6.h:59:8: error: redefinition of 'struct ipv6_mreq' > > Signed-off-by: Felix Janda <felix.janda@...teo.de> Acked-by: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> > --- > include/uapi/linux/libc-compat.h | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/libc-compat.h b/include/uapi/linux/libc-compat.h > index 44b8a6b..c316725 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/libc-compat.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/libc-compat.h > @@ -171,42 +171,94 @@ > #else /* !defined(__GLIBC__) */ Note that right now, the content above this line in libc-compat.h makes assumptions about what glibc does and doesn't define that are specific to current glibc versions. I think it would be nice to make the whole remainder of the file unconditional rather than being the #else path for !defined(__GLIBC__). Then future versions of glibc can properly define their own __UAPI_DEF_* macros to tell the kernel headers about anything new the define. But I don't think that has to be part of the same change you're proposing now. Rich > /* Definitions for if.h */ > +#if !defined(__UAPI_DEF_IF_IFCONF) > #define __UAPI_DEF_IF_IFCONF 1 > +#endif > +#if !defined(__UAPI_DEF_IF_IFMAP) > #define __UAPI_DEF_IF_IFMAP 1 > +#endif > +#if !defined(__UAPI_DEF_IFNAMSIZ) > #define __UAPI_DEF_IF_IFNAMSIZ 1 > +#endif > +#if !defined(__UAPI_DEF_IFREQ) > #define __UAPI_DEF_IF_IFREQ 1 > +#endif > /* Everything up to IFF_DYNAMIC, matches net/if.h until glibc 2.23 */ > +#if !defined(__UAPI_DEF_IF_NET_DEVICE_FLAGS) > #define __UAPI_DEF_IF_NET_DEVICE_FLAGS 1 > +#endif > /* For the future if glibc adds IFF_LOWER_UP, IFF_DORMANT and IFF_ECHO */ > +#if !defined(__UAPI_DEF_IF_NET_DEVICE_FLAGS_LOWER_UP_DORMANT_ECHO) > #define __UAPI_DEF_IF_NET_DEVICE_FLAGS_LOWER_UP_DORMANT_ECHO 1 > +#endif > > /* Definitions for in.h */ > +#if !defined(__UAPI_DEF_IN_ADDR) > #define __UAPI_DEF_IN_ADDR 1 > +#endif > +#if !defined(__UAPI_DEF_IN_IPPROTO) > #define __UAPI_DEF_IN_IPPROTO 1 > +#endif > +#if !defined(__UAPI_DEF_IN_PKTINFO) > #define __UAPI_DEF_IN_PKTINFO 1 > +#endif > +#if !defined(__UAPI_DEF_IP_MREQ) > #define __UAPI_DEF_IP_MREQ 1 > +#endif > +#if !defined(__UAPI_DEF_SOCKADDR_IN) > #define __UAPI_DEF_SOCKADDR_IN 1 > +#endif > +#if !defined(__UAPI_DEF_IN_CLASS) > #define __UAPI_DEF_IN_CLASS 1 > +#endif > > /* Definitions for in6.h */ > +#if !defined(__UAPI_DEF_IN6_ADDR) > #define __UAPI_DEF_IN6_ADDR 1 > +#endif > +#if !defined(__UAPI_DEF_IN6_ADDR_ALT) > #define __UAPI_DEF_IN6_ADDR_ALT 1 > +#endif > +#if !defined(__UAPI_DEF_SOCKADDR_IN6) > #define __UAPI_DEF_SOCKADDR_IN6 1 > +#endif > +#if !defined(__UAPI_DEF_IPV6_MREQ) > #define __UAPI_DEF_IPV6_MREQ 1 > +#endif > +#if !defined(__UAPI_DEF_IPPROTO_V6) > #define __UAPI_DEF_IPPROTO_V6 1 > +#endif > +#if !defined(__UAPI_DEF_IPV6_OPTIONS) > #define __UAPI_DEF_IPV6_OPTIONS 1 > +#endif > +#if !defined(__UAPI_DEF_IN6_PKTINFO) > #define __UAPI_DEF_IN6_PKTINFO 1 > +#endif > +#if !defined(__UAPI_DEF_IP6_MTUINFO) > #define __UAPI_DEF_IP6_MTUINFO 1 > +#endif > > /* Definitions for ipx.h */ > +#if !defined(__UAPI_DEF_SOCKADDR_IPX) > #define __UAPI_DEF_SOCKADDR_IPX 1 > +#endif > +#if !defined(__UAPI_DEF_IPX_ROUTE_DEFINITION) > #define __UAPI_DEF_IPX_ROUTE_DEFINITION 1 > +#endif > +#if !defined(__UAPI_DEF_IPX_INTERFACE_DEFINITION) > #define __UAPI_DEF_IPX_INTERFACE_DEFINITION 1 > +#endif > +#if !defined(__UAPI_DEF_IPX_CONFIG_DATA) > #define __UAPI_DEF_IPX_CONFIG_DATA 1 > +#endif > +#if !defined(__UAPI_DEF_IPX_ROUTE_DEF) > #define __UAPI_DEF_IPX_ROUTE_DEF 1 > +#endif > > /* Definitions for xattr.h */ > +#if !defined(__UAPI_DEF_XATTR) > #define __UAPI_DEF_XATTR 1 > +#endif > > #endif /* __GLIBC__ */ > > -- > 2.7.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.