Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 09:37:11 -0700 From: <writeonce@...ipix.org> To: "Johannes Schindelin" <Johannes.Schindelin@....de> Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com, git@...r.kernel.org, "Jeff King" <peff@...f.net> Subject: RE: Re: Regression: git no longer works with musl libc's regex impl Hi Johannes, > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: RE: [musl] Re: Regression: git no longer works with musl libc's > regex impl > From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@....de> > Date: Wed, October 05, 2016 3:49 am > To: writeonce@...ipix.org > Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com, git@...r.kernel.org, Jeff King > <peff@...f.net> > > Hi writeonce, > > On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, writeonce@...ipix.org wrote: > > > < On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Rich Felker wrote: > > < > > < > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 11:27:22AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > > < > > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 11:08:48AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > > < > > > > < > > > 1. is nonzero mod page size, it just works; the remainder of the > > < > > > last page reads as zero bytes when mmapped. > > < > > > > < > > Is that a portable assumption? > > < > > > < > Yes. > > < > > < No, it is not. You quote POSIX, but the matter of the fact is that we > > < use a subset of POSIX in order to be able to keep things running on > > < Windows. > > > > As far as I can tell (and as the attached program may help demonstrate), > > the above assumption has been valid on all versions of Windows since at > > least Windows 2000. > > And since W2K is already past its end of life, it would be safe for > practical considerations. > > However, I have to add two comments to that: > > - it is *not* guaranteed. The behavior is undefined, even if you see > consistent behavior so far. Future Windows versions might break that > assumption freely, though. > That is of course the official language, and generally speaking a good rule of thumb. However... there is enough information to suggest that when it comes to mapping of file-backed sections, the NT kernel developers will choose to keep things the way they are. In brief, here's why: Given a "gray zone" that spans from EOF to end-of-page, there are in essence three possible behaviors:  bytes in the gray zone are accessible and are all zero's. This is the current behavior.  bytes in the gray zone are not accessible; trying to read past EOF would result in a segfault.  bytes in the gray zone are accessible but might contain random data or junk. Assessment:  backward-compatible, POSIX-compliant, single code path for both WIN32 and LXW.  requires changing memory access granularity from 4096 bytes to a single byte, and is therefore extremely costly.  introduces a whole new class of security vulnerabilities, and will thus be a lot of fun to watch:-) All in all taken, then, I'd argue that relying on the current behavior is very reasonable. If you, too, find the above assessment valid, and since you mentioned that you were a Microsoft employee, it would be great if you could make a good-faith effort to have the current behavior added to the Driver Documentation and thus guaranteed. PS. this isn't to say that the regex extension should or should not be used, only that a decision on the matter should not be based on the undocumentedness of current behavior. midipix > - some implementations of the REG_STARTEND feature have the nice property > that they can read past NUL characters. Granted, not all of them do > (AFAIU one example is FreeBSD itself, the first platform to sport > REG_STARTEND), but we at least reap the benefit whenever using a regex > that *can* read past NUL characters. > > > In this context, one thing to remember is that the page-size for the mod > > operation is 4096, whereas the POSIX page-size (for the purpose of mmap > > and mremap) is 65536. > > Indeed. A colleague of mine spotted the segfault when diffing a file that > was *exactly* 4,096 bytes. > > > Note also that in the case of file-backed mapped sections, using > > kernel32.dll or msvcrt.dll or cygwin/newlib or midipix/musl is of little > > significance, specifically since all invoke ZwCreateSection and > > ZwMapViewOfSection under the hood. > > Right. It's all backed by the very same kernel functions. > > Ciao, > Johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.