|
|
Message-Id: <20160917160545.4348-1-dsabogalcc@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 12:05:45 -0400
From: Daniel Sabogal <dsabogalcc@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] fix clock_nanosleep error case
posix requires that EINVAL be returned if the first parameter specifies
the cpu-time clock of the calling thread (CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME_ID).
linux returns ENOTSUP instead so we handle this.
---
Applied Szabolcs' suggestion for remapping the return value.
clock_nanosleep is required to be a cancellation point.
---
src/time/clock_nanosleep.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/time/clock_nanosleep.c b/src/time/clock_nanosleep.c
index ec87b9e..9e4d9f1 100644
--- a/src/time/clock_nanosleep.c
+++ b/src/time/clock_nanosleep.c
@@ -1,8 +1,10 @@
#include <time.h>
+#include <errno.h>
#include "syscall.h"
#include "libc.h"
int clock_nanosleep(clockid_t clk, int flags, const struct timespec *req, struct timespec *rem)
{
- return -__syscall_cp(SYS_clock_nanosleep, clk, flags, req, rem);
+ int r = -__syscall_cp(SYS_clock_nanosleep, clk, flags, req, rem);
+ return clk == CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME_ID ? EINVAL : r;
}
--
2.10.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.