[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 15:25:02 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] getdtablesize: Fix returning hard instead of soft
rlimit
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 08:31:49PM +0200, Olivier Brunel wrote:
> ---
> src/legacy/getdtablesize.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/legacy/getdtablesize.c b/src/legacy/getdtablesize.c
> index 682da6d..b30c193 100644
> --- a/src/legacy/getdtablesize.c
> +++ b/src/legacy/getdtablesize.c
> @@ -7,5 +7,5 @@ int getdtablesize(void)
> {
> struct rlimit rl;
> getrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, &rl);
> - return rl.rlim_max < INT_MAX ? rl.rlim_max : INT_MAX;
> + return rl.rlim_cur < INT_MAX ? rl.rlim_cur : INT_MAX;
Is there a motivation for this?
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
