Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 17:14:52 -0400 From: Kylie McClain <somasissounds@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: relative link between libc.so and the dynamic linker On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Sidney Manning <sidneym@...eaurora.org> wrote: > I'd like to suggest making the symbolic link between libc.so and > ld-musl-<target>.so.1 relative rather than absolute. A relative path makes > movement between systems easier, in particular when one is copying cross > binaries to into a runtime environment. > > diff --git a/tools/install.sh b/tools/install.sh > index d913b60..1c102f5 100755 > --- a/tools/install.sh > +++ b/tools/install.sh > @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ trap 'rm -f "$tmp"' EXIT INT QUIT TERM HUP > umask 077 > > if test "$symlink" ; then > -ln -s "$1" "$tmp" > +ln -s -r "$1" "$tmp" This would introduce a dependency on a non-standard GNUism in the coreutils ln implementation.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.