Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 17:58:22 +0100 From: Raphael Cohn <raphael.cohn@...rmmq.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: RUSAGE_THREAD On 28 June 2016 at 17:52, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 04:00:45PM +0100, Raphael Cohn wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm in the process of compiling ZFS on Linux against musl. ZFS seems to > > make a few slightly glibc-like assumptions, one of which is the use of > > RUSAGE_THREAD. Musl seems to lack a definition of this in sys/resource.h. > > Is this deliberate? > > > > Glibc defines RUSAGE_THREAD as 1, but musl already uses this value for > > RUSAGE_CHILDREN (glibc sets this as -1). What would be the correct value > > for RUSAGE_THREAD with musl? > > Maybe this is incorrect in musl then. Can anyone confirm? The values > are determined by (i.e. have to match) the kernel. > > Rich > I've grabbed the 4.6 linux kernel sources. A quick grep suggests include/uapi/linux/resource.h defines it as 1. Additionally, in this file:- RUSAGE_SELF is 0 (I believe this is also the value musl uses). RUSAGE_CHILDREN is -1 RUSAGE_BOTH is -2 (not in glibc; not mentioned in the getrusage man pages I have). What does anyone else think? Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.