Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 23:45:42 +0200
From: Szabolcs Nagy <>
Subject: Re: make install permissions

* Philip Deegan <> [2016-06-06 21:54:02 +0100]:
> I'm trying out musl and I noticed that even when "--prefix" is used for
> "configure", "make install" still tries to put a symlink in "/lib".
> Is this intentional?

of course the dynamic linker name is part of the abi,
if you change that then you loose binary portability.

you can still change it by configuring musl with
different --syslibdir

> I rather keep my system directories clean and isolate my dev stuff.

the binaries will have non-standard interpreter path
in them, so they will only work with that particular
path setup.

> Thanks
> PS. Is there a "musl-g++.specs" floating around anywhere?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.