Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 23:45:42 +0200 From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: make install permissions * Philip Deegan <philip.deegan@...il.com> [2016-06-06 21:54:02 +0100]: > I'm trying out musl and I noticed that even when "--prefix" is used for > "configure", "make install" still tries to put a symlink in "/lib". > > Is this intentional? > of course the dynamic linker name is part of the abi, if you change that then you loose binary portability. you can still change it by configuring musl with different --syslibdir > I rather keep my system directories clean and isolate my dev stuff. > the binaries will have non-standard interpreter path in them, so they will only work with that particular path setup. > Thanks > > PS. Is there a "musl-g++.specs" floating around anywhere?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.