[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.20.1605101010350.31992@monopod.intra.ispras.ru>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 10:34:48 +0300 (MSK)
From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@...ras.ru>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Deduplicating __NR_* and SYS_* syscall defines
On Mon, 9 May 2016, Bobby Bingham wrote:
> The handling for #undef is for the x32 file. It looks like only the
> `#undef __NR_getdents' in that file is actually necessary, and even that
> could be avoided by just omitting the earlier line:
>
> #define __NR_getdents (__X32_SYSCALL_BIT + 78)
>
> So maybe we can get rid of the #undefs there, and simplify the awk script
> accordingly.
+1, seems pointless to define something only to undefine a few lines later.
And the inconsistency between undefs (the other three undef something that
wasn't even defined earlier) is puzzling. Finally, __NR_fadvise is not
undef'ed before definition like the other four.
> Thoughts on this approach? If this sounds ok, I'll submit a patch.
It's possible to avoid interleaving __NR_ and SYS_ definitions and keep
current structure mostly intact:
cp $< $@
sed -e /^#define/s/__NR_/SYS_/p < $< >> $@
(bits/syscall.h is not included on its own, so it lacks include guards)
Thanks for looking into this!
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
