Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 22:49:28 +0200 From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Cc: Patrick Oppenlander <pattyo.lists@...il.com> Subject: Re: musl-cross-make / litecross improvements * Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> [2016-05-05 22:44:54 -0400]: > not built at all for a c/c++ only build. Other langs are completely > untested and probably don't work, but it would be nice to find out why > and fix the ones that are practical to fix. btw, for fortran --disable-libquadmath is not enough, you need --disable-libquadmath-support too, see https://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html so i think those options should be recommended together. there are patches to make java and ada frontends work (by alpine linux) but those are much less tested than the c,c++ case. > > Are you planning on supporting GCC 5.3? I may be able to contribute > > some patches. > > I suspect the same patches for 5.2 apply just fine, but I haven't > taken the time to test yet. If you can confirm they work or tweak them > so they work I'd be happy to add 5.3 support. Other versions I'd like i think the powerpc patches wont apply, but i have all my patches rebased for 5.3 > to support are 4.7.4 (last C-only, also last before some sketchy likewise. > optimizations were added) and 6.1.0, but in order to add a version it likewise. > should have proper support (at least the main musl patch with dynamic > linker names, include paths, etc. fully ported) rather than just being > enough to compile. but i didnt test these patches with mcm, they don't have the pie/fdpic/sh stuff and they might contain extra changes that probably not everyone wants. View attachment "gcc-4.7.4.diff" of type "text/x-diff" (43559 bytes) View attachment "gcc-5.3.0.diff" of type "text/x-diff" (37442 bytes) View attachment "gcc-6.1.0.diff" of type "text/x-diff" (7245 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.