Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 23:57:05 +0200 From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com, j-core@...ore.org Subject: Re: musl-cross-make / litecross improvements * Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> [2016-05-03 22:16:22 +0200]: > * Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> [2016-05-03 14:02:30 -0400]: > > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 01:39:43PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > > > i think the usr/ and lib64/ symlinks are useful > > > (so it can be used as rootfs without fiddling > > > with etc/ld-musl*.path). > > > > Yes. Is there a good way to override that in gcc or should we just > > make the symlinks? > > > > output/lib64 can be eliminated by > COMMON_CONFIG += --libdir=/lib > > output/x86_64-linux-musl/lib64 install path is trickier: > it is controlled by the $toolexeclibdir make variable. > which is set according to $CC -print-multi-os-directory > which is controlled by multilib and multilib_defaults from > $CC -dumpspecs which comes from multilib.h generated by > genmultilib based on parameters from config/i386/t-linux64 > it was not clear if the t-linux64 thing could be overridden, but GCC_CONFIG += --with-multilib-list= fixes it (the lib dir is lib/ then).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.