Date: Sun, 01 May 2016 17:19:21 -0400 From: anonymous <johnandsara2@....net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: musl works in distro x-lsf-2010 - advice of use requested Hi. I have "new distro* compiling musl" (easy) - should it build pkgs against it? http://sourceforge.net/p/x-lfs-2010/ (to build musl-libc, only required "-std=c99" added to CFLAGS, which is not default for gcc-4.4.5 which is used) i have gnu libc6 and libc5 fully sourced and compiled (i can't say i'm too happy with the complexity but they build and run) QUESTION: Should I try building gnu automake or other packages against musl-libc and offer the option to build against musl-libc? Or is it more "no, use musl-libc for NEW embedded projects and leave libc6 libc5 as they are for supporting (2010 era) linux bins" x-lfs-2010 distro build all from scratch (350+ pkg) hands free overnight, and the end result need to be runtime libc6 and libc5-compat to run "unix bins" (ie, bins that would work in either slackware or debian because they are both unix and i386) and mostly: commercial mathematica around version 4 sure i could build some pkgs against musl-libc but for the big picture "what issues am i looking at for musl-libc to act as libc and libc5-compat" and would musl-libc like to see such a development ? have a good one!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.