Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 22:38:33 +0200 From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] add powerpc64 port * Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> [2016-04-14 15:42:13 +0200]: > * Bobby Bingham <koorogi@...rogi.info> [2016-04-14 03:01:38 -0500]: > > > > How important is it to match glibc here? > > > > i think we don't care about abi compat > (but it might be interesting to check how much abi > difference there is between glibc and musl, i can > do this if i can build a musl+glibc toolchain) > attached some c++ abi comparisions (the comparision was not entirely clean, it involved various manual hacks, but most types and functions should be compared correctly glibc vs musl) two interesting gcc warnings: powerpc64 elf_vrreg_t (both musl and glibc): note: the ABI of passing aggregates with 16-byte alignment has changed in GCC 5 x86_64 struct inotify_event (musl only): note: the ABI of passing struct with a flexible array member has changed in GCC 4.4 View attachment "abi_type.powerpc64le.diff" of type "text/x-diff" (5984 bytes) View attachment "abi_func.powerpc64le.diff" of type "text/x-diff" (5519 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.