Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:43:24 +0200
Subject: Re: musl licensing

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 07:11:45AM -0700, Christopher Lane wrote:
> On Mar 29, 2016 11:56 PM, <> wrote:
> > This is not necessarily a question of ethics, but somewhat a question
> > of legal safety, as well as it is for Google.

> > Rich/musl are on the other side and it certainly is illegal (somewhere)
> > to claim copyright on something which is not copyrightable (at that
> place).
> I don't know that this is true.  We can set aside whether the crt files and

Neither do I, and I regret having written "certainly". There is no
certainty unless a court has decided one's case. The uncertainty is
the only thing which can be assumed.

Claiming a "eager" copyright is invoking UB on Rich's/project's behalf,
that's my point.

This may be harmless now and may even always and everywhere remain
harmless (I really hope so!) but _possibly_ not.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.