[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 20:05:29 +0800
From: Lei Zhang <zhanglei.april@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: musl + libc++
On Mar 22, 2016, at 7:48 PM, Luca Barbato <lu_zero@...too.org> wrote:
>
> On 22/03/16 04:43, Lei Zhang wrote:
>> 2016-03-22 7:39 GMT+08:00 Hayden Livingston <halivingston@...il.com>:
>>
>>> Have folks gotten around using musl + libc++ (from the llvm project)?
>>>
>>> I'm trying to get a setup where all my dependencies can be moved to
>>> musl and libc++ to build static executables.
>>>
>>
>> I've tried to do about the same thing before and failed because libc++
>> depends on some functions not implemented in musl yet, like strtoll_l()
>> and __printf_chk() IIRC.
>
> Nothing should directly use __printf_chk() how did you get that symbol
> there?.
Well, I manually linked a toy C++ program with musl and libc++, and when I ran the program the dynamic linker complained about not finding a bunch of symbols, including strtoll_l, __printf_chk, etc. Perhaps I mistakenly messed musl with glibc somehow...
Lei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
