Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 20:05:29 +0800 From: Lei Zhang <zhanglei.april@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: musl + libc++ On Mar 22, 2016, at 7:48 PM, Luca Barbato <lu_zero@...too.org> wrote: > > On 22/03/16 04:43, Lei Zhang wrote: >> 2016-03-22 7:39 GMT+08:00 Hayden Livingston <halivingston@...il.com>: >> >>> Have folks gotten around using musl + libc++ (from the llvm project)? >>> >>> I'm trying to get a setup where all my dependencies can be moved to >>> musl and libc++ to build static executables. >>> >> >> I've tried to do about the same thing before and failed because libc++ >> depends on some functions not implemented in musl yet, like strtoll_l() >> and __printf_chk() IIRC. > > Nothing should directly use __printf_chk() how did you get that symbol > there?. Well, I manually linked a toy C++ program with musl and libc++, and when I ran the program the dynamic linker complained about not finding a bunch of symbols, including strtoll_l, __printf_chk, etc. Perhaps I mistakenly messed musl with glibc somehow... Lei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.