[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 12:10:58 +0100
From: Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...il.com>
To: Hayden Livingston <halivingston@...il.com>
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: musl + libc++
Hayden Livingston <halivingston@...il.com> writes:
> Have folks gotten around using musl + libc++ (from the llvm project)?
>
> I'm trying to get a setup where all my dependencies can be moved to
> musl and libc++ to build static executables.
>
> I've heard of all sorts of weird interactions when libc++ and
> libstdc++ are in the same process. Or is that unfounded?
I managed to build a pure LLVM-clang-libc++-musl branch of Void Linux,
without too heavy patching required.
The base-system is completely free of gcc or libgcc.
https://github.com/chneukirchen/xbps-packages/tree/llvm-musl
--
Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...il.com> http://chneukirchen.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
