Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 10:30:59 -0500 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add `intl` to EMPTY_LIB_NAMES. On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 04:13:31PM +0900, Masanori Ogino wrote: > Now I got them thanks to Google: > > http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2015/04/16/1 > http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2015/04/16/2 > http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2015/04/16/3 > http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2015/04/16/4 > http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?46436 > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gettext/2015-11/msg00015.html > > >From the last link: > > According to the post linked from the above, the check seems to be there > > to exclude incompatible implementations of gettext(), like Solaris 7 and > > NetBSD: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-utils/2006-03/msg00011.html > > > > If musl's gettext implementation is compatible with GNU gettext, I guess > > we could adjust the check to accept it. However, I have no idea which > > symbols or macros can be used for the check. It would be helpful if > > musl people could chime in and give us a hint. The right fix is to change the logic from "If we find glibc-internal symbols" to: "If the public API symbols are there and this isn't Solaris or whatever other system has a broken gettext" I don't know if they are willing to make such a change. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.