[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 14:06:20 +0100
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: Pedro Giffuni <pfg@...eBSD.org>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD's Google Summer of Code 2016
* Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org> [2016-03-07 09:32:17 +0100]:
> What about umtx? It's supposed to be just like linux futex.
>
i see
https://svnweb.FreeBSD.org/base/head/sys/sys/umtx.h?view=markup
but there seems to be no documentation for it in
https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi
if _umtx_op does what it seems to do, then i think musl can be
ported to native freebsd syscalls, but i don't know how much
syscall abi stability freebsd is willing to guarantee.
i think historically that was assumed to be a private interface
between the libc and the kernel on bsd (in which case a musl port
cannot be easily maintained outside of the bsd source repo).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
