Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 14:21:00 -0500 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: Clang static analyser results On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 10:56:33PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > > > On Mar 2, 2016, at 10:32 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@...il.com> wrote: > > > > All, > > > > I ran clang static analyser on tip of git today for x86_64 build. The results are here Thanks! > > https://busybox.net/~kraj/scan-build-2016-03-02-222206-32091-1/ > > and > > https://busybox.net/~kraj/scan-build-2016-03-02-225259-30448-1/ > > is arm cross built with clang as CC Any idea why the results are different for arm? Most of the code where things are reported does not differ by arch. I think everything reported has been investigated before and found to be false positives. Do any of them look new/interesting? Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.