Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:12:39 +0300 (MSK) From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@...ras.ru> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Compile error with --target=i386 On Tue, 16 Feb 2016, Rich Felker wrote: > In the case of musl, CFLAGS is always passed even at the linking > stage; I think the problem is just at configure time, where the > user-provided CFLAGS are not used in all the configure-time tests. > Maybe this is contrary to the normal UI for configure scripts and > should be changed? I don't have a strong opinion whether it's contrary or not; my weak opinion is that it is contrary, indeed; but nevertheless I stand by my original point that -m32 is better when specified in $CC, generally speaking. If you look at the opening post, you'll see that -m32 does not appear on the quoted command line. If Petr did it as he has shown, he forgot to 'export' the variable; this would explain the failure (otherwise as you say it should have worked). Also please note that $CC should have -m32 (and any other ABI tweaks) for musl-gcc to work as intended. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.