Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 11:18:44 +0100 From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Bits deduplication: current situation * Dan Gohman <sunfish@...illa.com> [2016-01-25 21:03:54 -0800]: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> wrote: > > * Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> [2016-01-25 16:00:05 -0500]: > > > > > > I'm pretty sure int64_t is long on all LP64 targets we support. Are > > > there others that differ? > > > > I'm working on an architecture which does, though there's no musl support > for it currently. > in gcc stdint.h only depends on libc/os and sizeof(long), not on architecture. (e.g. openbsd uses long long, glibc uses long consistently for all LP64 arch abis.)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.