[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 23:30:58 +0300 (MSK)
From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@...ras.ru>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: for information, gcc-4.2.3 miscompiles musl math
On Sat, 21 Nov 2015, u-uy74@...ey.se wrote:
> > > I do not notice any problems while compiling musl with gcc-5.2, nor
> > > have a compelling reason to insist on using gcc-4.2.3 (somebody else
> > > might have though, gcc-4.2.3 is the last one under gpl 2).
> >
> > I thought 4.2.1 was the last.
>
> I think Wikipedia says so as well but The Source is the truth. It is
> 4.2.3 and nothing else.
Are you perhaps concluding that just from the absence of COPYING3 in the
toplevel directory? The gcc/ subdirectory does contain COPYING3, and
individual *.c files explicitely mention GPLv3 in the copyright notice in the
block comment at the top of the file. Ditto for 4.2.2.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
