Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:06:08 +0100 From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Support for out-of-tree build * Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> [2015-11-17 17:01:41 -0500]: > However, at this point I'm strongly considering whether we should just > do away with the subarch dirs entirely and use preprocessed asm or C > with inline asm in their place. The one place this is mildly difficult ... > > Would this make things simpler for the build system? I think so. ok, but that's a separate change then i think the relevant decision for out-of-tree is if we want to keep %.o: $(ARCH)/%.s which means VPATH is needed, or if it's ok to have .o files under the $(ARCH) dir, so the rules are just %.o: %.s %.o: %.sub (of course setting $(OBJS) is more tricky then) i think we can then do out-of-tree independently from the subarch changes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.