Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 17:57:10 -0400 From: Kurt H Maier <khm@....org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: Would love to see reconsideration for domain and search On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 02:33:31PM -0700, Tim Hockin wrote: > Where is the standard that defines ordering semantics in resolv.conf? There isn't one, but that doesn't mean you get to ensconce the behavior you like. That was my point. > Search has to be ordered. You can not possibly argue otherwise? I can and do. > I am arguing for adding a very standard feature (search) to open musl to a > whole new space of users. You're not arguing for simple inclusion of search; you're arguing for specific behavior that is impossible to implement in a sane manner, because that's how glibc does it. I am not against domain and search, but I don't just want functionality poorly added just to check some box on a random other project's wishlist. > Nobody is forcing you to use search paths or ndots. Not sure how this is relevant? Nobody's forcing anyone to do anything. What is your point? khm
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.