[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 19:20:49 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] i386/memset: argument load code need not be
separate
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 08:30:32PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> "large memset" and "small memset" code paths were using two separate copies
> of loads from 8(%esp) and 4(%esp). No need to have this duplication.
> [...]
Thanks! I'm in the middle of trying to clear out the pending
issue/patch queue for 1.1.12 right now, so I'm going to hold off on
running the benchmarks and reviewing this series until after the
release. As you recall, tweaking these functions can turn into a time
sink for me. :-) But I do want to acknowledge receiving your patches
and let you know that I plan to look at them soon.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
