Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 08:39:22 +0300 From: Timo Teras <timo.teras@....fi> To: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: musl bug or not, real or not? (Was: Update: pthread_getattr_np() vs explicit runtime) loader On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 12:48:25 -0400 Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:43:39AM +0300, Timo Teras wrote: > > gcj uses boehm-gc. Alpine has patches for gcc boehm-gc. We are also > > patching gcc's gcj. You can see our full patch set at: > > http://git.alpinelinux.org/cgit/aports/tree/main/gcc > > > > Some of these may or may not fix the issue you have at had. Not sure > > how your gcc/gcj is built. > > Thank you very much for finding the cause of this. Do you know if > these patches have been submitted upstream to gcc and/or boehm? > Obviously assuming by default that __environ is the start of .data and > only doing a proper search on glibc is broken basically everywhere but > glibc. The dl_iterate_phdr stuff should probably use a configure > check; I think one already exists in gcc but the boehm-gc dir might > need its own. I think not. I did write most of those patches, but most of them are not suitable for upstreaming as-is. Additional configury magic would be needed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.