Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 15:38:09 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Results of static analysis with clang static analyser On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 10:58:55PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > Hi All > > I have run scan-build on musl-git and here are results > > http://busybox.net/~kraj/scan-build-2015-09-22-224330-15962-1/ At a quick glance, most of these seem to be cases of assuming system calls do not store to the objects they receive pointers to. This makes them false positives, but if llvm is actually making that same assumption when optimizing that could be a bug in itself. Hopefully it's just treating it as "unknown" whether the object is stored to, rather than "definitely not accessed". I'll look at it in more detail later. Thanks! Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.