Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 18:39:32 +0700 From: Рысь <lynx@...server.ru> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Adjustments to roadmap On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 09:24:22 +0200 u-wsnj@...ey.se wrote: > > I don't think the status quo is a reasonable option. We should > > either teach GCC that musl targets don't support symbol versioning, > > and make sure apps/libs' build systems detect this, or we should > > make them work. My leaning is towards the latter. > > I'd rather prefer the former. Otherwise supporting an approach chosen > for unrelated reasons somewhere else imposes a certain complexity > cost on musl and on any packager/integrator who does not need > versioning. > > Rune > I agree with this too. What are the real reasons raised to reconsider support for symbol versioning? How other not glibc build environments currently handle them?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.