[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150622140856.GA19177@port70.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:08:57 +0200
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: libc-test reports
* Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> [2015-06-19 20:00:30 +0200]:
> * Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@...nadk.org> [2015-06-18 07:47:33 +0200]:
> > But here are the results from a complete run for 1.10
> > and git from yesterday:
> >
> > http://tests.embedded-test.org/musl/
> >
>
> can you make these binaries available somewhere:
> FAIL ./src/functional/sem_open-static.exe [signal Segmentation fault]
> FAIL ./src/regression/fgets-eof-static.exe [signal Segmentation fault]
>
ok, both of them die the exact same way:
brk(0) = 0x1cf6000
brk(0x1cf8000) = 0x1cf8000
--- SIGSEGV {si_signo=SIGSEGV, si_code=SEGV_MAPERR, si_addr=0x1cf5ff8} ---
a dereference 8 bytes before the first brk
there is no debug info, but based on the asm it seems to be
the p[-1] access in calloc.c:
p = malloc(n);
if (!p) return 0;
/* Only do this for non-mmapped chunks */
if (((size_t *)p)[-1] & 7) {
i think __simple_malloc is used in these tests.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
